|
|
Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi |
|
|
Convicted in 2001 of 1988 Lockerbie airliner bombing. Case referred by the SCCRC for a second appeal 2008. The appeal has now been abandoned and Megrahi has been released on compassionate grounds, as he is said to be terminally ill. He has returned to Libya. |
| Documents on Lockerbie may never be seen, by Lucy Adams |
Flaws in key evidence exposed by BBC Newsnight investigation (report by Peter Marshall broadcast 6 January 2010) |
Appeal documents published online - click here to read themFrom the website set up to publish papers relating to this case: |
$2m witness payment, bogus forensic evidence and Pentagon memo blaming Iran: How Lockerbie bomber appeal threatened Scottish justice, by ANTONIA HOYLE and FIDELMA COOK, 23rd August 2009 A report of an interview with Ian Ferguson, author of Cover-up of Convenience - The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie. Mr Ferguson told the Mail:
Whatever Obama and the CIA may be saying about al-Megrahi's release, American intelligence services believed that Libya was not responsible for the bombing. Key witness Tony Gauci was paid $2m for his dodgy evidence. |
Lockerbie: was it Iran? Syria? All I know is, it wasn't the man in prison, by Hugh Miles 21 December 2008The fate of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, however, and the tarnished reputation of the Scottish criminal justice system rest in the hand of the Scottish courts. Megrahi's acquittal, posthumous or otherwise, will undo a heinous wrong and return us to where we were 20 years ago – searching for the truth behind the bombing of Pan Am flight 103. |
Aisha Al Megrahi, Al-Megrahi's wife, issued the following statement in Edinburgh on 4 December 2008: |
The Megrahi I know, by Tam DalyellVisiting him in prison, I was struck by his self-possession - a self-possession that had struck many people at his trial, possibly because it never occurred to him that he would be found guilty... Lockerbie questions demand an answer, by Magnus LinklaterWhy was it that, for the first 18 months of the investigation, Scottish police, US investigators and European security agents were convinced that the perpetrators were Abu Nidal's PFLP? And why was it that, in the run-up to the Gulf War, when good relations with Syria and Iran were important to Western interests, attention switched abruptly from Abu Nidal's terrorists, and on to Libya? These matters have never satisfactorily been explained.. 28 August 2008 15 June 2008 '...Miliband's decision to sign a public interest immunity certificate that prevents disclosure to al-Megrahi's defence of this potentially crucial evidence, ignoring and over-ruling the wishes of the Lord Advocate, is a disgraceful one that will do nothing for the international reputation of British justice. Since when was it in the public interest to treat a court of law as though it were an inconvenience in a wider game of supposed diplomatic back-door dealings?' Read more...Vital Lockerbie evidence 'was tampered with'Fragments of bomb timer that helped to convict a Libyan ex-agent were 'practically carbonised' before the trial, says bankrupt Swiss businessmanAlex Duval Smith, Europe correspondent September 2, 2007 ![]() Now a US intelligence insider says his trial was a CIA fix. Read more in the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission to refer case for new appeal A fuller article appears in the |
|
|